Sahi ya Galat?

Tho pandavas fought for the establishment of DHARMA but they did several things which were completely against the so called DHARMA. 

Yudhisthtira played the game of dice. Lost his wife in a game. Was it right? No, it wasn’t.

Mahabharata was not fought because of a woman. The saddest part is that we never question wrong doings of a man. Does equality really exist? Huh!

The statement of duryodhan for Draupadi to sit on his lap and disrespectful actions of Dushasana towards Draupadi were not at all humanly.

The legends of war surrounded Abhimanyu, a kid not more than 16 and brutally killed him when not even his father was around.

We should not forget that even Dronacharya was killed by plotting a conspiracy against him. Tho ‘Satyavadi’ Yudhisthtira didn’t lie but he didn’t even say the whole truth.

Tho dushasana was punished for his wrong doing but how these socalled dharama establishers forgot that mercy is greater than justice. But anyways at this point they were right as well. They set an example that the ones who won’t treat  women in a correct way, they won’t be spared. And I appreciate that.

Karan was also killed when he was armless. He pledged to take a pause and let him take the wheel of his chariot out of the mud and then they shall continue. But his request was denied. And also he suffered due to the curse according to which he would lose his knowledge once whenever he will need it the most. Being Surya putra he was always given the title of Sut putra and was mistreated.

Also when Arjuna was about to kill Jaidrath, Lord Krishna used his divine powers and again chose a path which was never supposed to be the one of genuine play.

I am not saying that Kaurvas were right or Pandavas were. These are just a few examples. And if we go into analysis then they won’t ever cease. My only point is, ‘’We can never clap with one hand, we need both our hands for that’’. It’s always from both the ends.

Can't we just appreciate someone's good deeds even if he is represented as a villain in our mythological stories and can't we depreciate someone's wrongs even if he is represented as the man of hour in our mythological stories. To blindly accept what is wrong and what is right, is it right? The unjustified or the unanswered faiths should be analyzed. What is right and what is wrong is completely subjective. Something wrong for you can be right for me and something right for you can be wrong for me.

Duryodhana's stand on Karana's side, claiming him as his own when other people were ruthlessly disgracing his presence. When society abandoned Karana, he gave refuge. When society insulted him, he respected. Can't we just appreciate this act of kindness?

Yudhisthira staked him wife at the game of dice. Was it right? We criticize disrespectful actions of Dushasana towards Draupadi, which we completely should but before that why don't we admit staking of  Draupadi as an act of shame? 

Personally I have huge respect for Abhimanyu and Karana.

And yes I would love to end up saying, ‘’ To find a chariot like lord Krishna in this yuga is almost impossible but do search for a friend like Karana’’. 

KRISHNA IS SUPERIOR.🦚